The University of British Columbia
UBC - A Place of Mind
The University of British Columbia Vancouver campus
Arts One Open
  • About
    • People
  • Themes
    • Repetition Compulsion
    • Remake/Remodel
    • Explorations and Encounters
    • Monster in the Mirror
    • Dangerous Questions
    • Borderlines
    • Hopes and Fears
  • Lectures and Podcasts
    • Lectures
    • Podcasts
  • Texts
  • Blog posts
    • Seeing & Knowing LB1 (2015/16)
    • Seeing & Knowing LB3 (2015/16)
    • Seeing & Knowing LB4 (2015/16)
    • Repetition Compulsion LB1 (2014/15)
    • Repetition Compulsion LB4 (2014/15)
    • Repetition Compulsion LB5 (2014/15)
    • Remake/Remodel LB3 (2013/14)
    • Remake/Remodel LB4 (2013/14)
    • Remake/Remodel LB5 (2013/14)
    • Monster in the Mirror LB1 (2012/13)
    • Monster in the Mirror LB2 (2012/13)
    • Public
    • All
  • Twitter

Plato, Republic

Plato. Marble, Roman copy after a Greek original from the last quarter of the 4th century.

Plato, Republic (4th century BCE)
Edition used: Hackett (1992)
Public domain version: link to this text on Project Gutenberg

 

  • About
  • Lecture
  • Other Formats
  • Questions

Christina Hendricks gives the historical political context in which Plato wrote this text, talks about the Socratic elenchus and how it is exemplified in Book I, and discusses the parallel structure of the kallipolis and the soul.

Faculty: Christina Hendricks
Lecture title: “Plato’s Republic: Politics and Ethics”
Lecture date: September 29, 2014
Theme: Repetition Compulsion

  • Powerpoint slide presentation
  • PDF of slides
  1. In what ways could we distinguish a Homeric hero from a Platonic philosopher-king, and how do these distinctions reflect the values and/or worldviews expressed in The Odyssey and the Republic?
  2. Plato has Socrates argue that imitative poets should be banished from the ideal state. How, then, can we account for Plato’s own extensive use of images, symbols, allegories, and other poetic devices in the Republic?
  3. Compare the role of the body and/or emotions in Plato’s Republic and Atwood’s Penelopiad.
  4. Plato condemns the political model of Thrasymachus on the grounds that its rulers educate and govern by coercive force for personal advantage. What, if anything, prevents us from drawing the same conclusion about Plato?
  5. Examine the relationship between the dialogue form and the content of the argument in Plato’s Republic.
  6. How does Plato’s emphasis on the distinction between appearance and reality bear on the relationship of knowledge to power?
  7. Compare Plato’s apparent unwillingness to speak directly of the form of the Good to Kierkegaard’s inability to speak of the nature of faith.
  8. Examine Plato’s treatment of sight, both metaphorical and physical, and the role it plays in his larger argument in the Republic.
  9. Why does Plato end the Republic with the Myth of Er? What problems, if any, might arise from doing so?

 

More material related to Plato

 

Posted in Christina Hendricks, lecture, powerpoint, Repetition Compulsion, video | Tagged with Greece, kallipolis, philosopher-kings, philosophy, Plato, Republic, Socrates

J M Coetzee
Creative Commons License
Faculty of Arts
Vancouver Campus
East Mall
Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z1
Website artsone-open.arts.ubc.ca
Email artsoneopen@gmail.com
Find us on
    
Back to top
The University of British Columbia
  • Emergency Procedures |
  • Terms of Use |
  • Copyright |
  • Accessibility